Suppose is an -dimensional -vector space and is basis for . Since is the free -module on the set , each linear transformation corresponds to a unique choice of vectors , namely the images of each of the basis vectors . Moreover, the determinant is a function that assigns to a single value . With the basis fixed, this determinant can be viewed as a function
that assigns to each -tuple the determinant of the corresponding linear transformation.
This determinant function is characterized by three nice properties:
It is alternating: If we swap the positions of two of the vectors in the -tuple, the determinant changes sign.
It is multilinear: If we fix all but one vector in the -tuple, the resulting function is -linear.
It is 1 on the identity transformation.
One immediate consequence of the first property is that if for any distinct then the determinant of that -tuple is zero. Combined with the second property, it follows that the determinant of an -tuple is zero whenever the vectors are linearly dependent.
This alternating multilinear function seems like something very close to the tensor algebra or symmetric algebra construction. Let's begin by looking for an analogue of the tensor algebra for which we have the additional property that for all .
The construction
Definition of exterior algebra
Let be a commutative ring (with unity) and be an -module. The exterior algebra of is the -algebra obtained by taking the quotient of the tensor algebra by the ideal generated by all elements of the form for . The exterior algebra is denoted and the image of in is denoted .
As with the symmetric algebra, the ideal is generated by homogenous elements and hence is a graded ideal. It follows that is a graded ring and the homogeneous component of degree is
This -module is called the exterior power of . Note that since is generated (as an ideal) by degree 2 homogenous elements, we have and hence have and .
Notational note
Anecdotally, it seems common to drop the parentheses when dealing with the exterior algebra, and instead write simply and . Dummit & Foote does not do this, however, so I have stuck with the parentheses here. (It also matches our notation for the tensor and symmetric algebras.)
The alternating property
The multiplication in is given by
This is called the wedge (or exterior) product.
This multiplication is alternating in the following sense. By construction, we have in whenever for any . We claim that we then have anti-commutativity for simple wedges; i.e., for every we have
To see this, observe that by construction we have
Expanding out the left-hand side gives
The first and last wedges are zero by construction. The claim thus follows.
Warning
This anti-commutativity does not extend to arbitrary products. For example,
So and commute.
A universal property of the exterior algebra
Like the tensor and symmetric algebras, the exterior algebra construction is indeed (the object function of) a functor left adjoint to a certain forgetful functor. Unlike the previous two constructions, however, the correct category from which we are forgetting is not so obvious. So instead let's first note the following.
For each -module , define a functor as follows:
The object function: Let denote the forgetful functor. For each -algebra , let be the set of -module morphisms that satisfy in for every .
The arrow function: For each -algebra morphism , define by "composition with ". In other words, for each -module morphism that satisfies for all , let .
It turns out that the -algebra represents the functor , in the sense that there is a natural isomorphism
In other words, there are natural bijections
More concretely, for every -algebra and -module morphism such that for all , there exists a unique -algebra morphism through which "factors", i.e., such that equals the composition of the inclusion of into (as the degree 1 component) followed by (really ).
You usually see this property expressed informally as "Maps from to algebras with extend uniquely to maps from ."
It's also true that this construction is functorial, in that we can define an "exterior algebra functor"
However, this functor is not adjoint to any functor (that I know of). What is true is that you can define a new type of algebra, sometimes called a super-commutative -algebra[1], and that our construction is really a functor from the category of -modules to the category of super-commutative -algebras, left adjoint to the evident forgetful functor from super-commutative -algebras back to -modules. But that's a bit too much for our current interests, so let's move on to some examples.
Examples
Suppose is an -dimensional vector space over a field with basis . When , the set of vectors
is a basis for . When the -module is trivial.
This same statement is true more generally when is a commutative ring and is a free -module of rank .^51701e
Continuing the previous example, suppose is any linear endomorphism of . For every we then have a -linear transformation
When , the -vector space is one-dimensional with basis vector and
for some scalar . One can verify that this function satisfies the three axioms for a determinant function and hence .