For each positive integer let's write for the (commutative) ring . Here are some quick facts:
The ring is a field when is prime, but not even a domain when is composite.
If we forget the multiplicative operation, we can view as an abelian group under addition. There should be notation to distinguish whether we are viewing as a ring or as a group (and there is in category theory), but most algebraists just say (or imply) the type of structure they're considering.
Up to (group) isomorphism, for each positive integer there is a unique cyclic group of order , namely .
We also have very precise information about the entire lattice of subgroups of a finite cyclic group:
Subgroups of finite cyclic groups
Suppose is a finite cyclic group of order , i.e, . Then for every subgroup we have:
is cyclic; and
divides .
Conversely, for each divisor of there is a unique subgroup of order . This subgroup consists precisely of those elements that have order dividing . (If we use multiplicative notation in , then these are the elements that satisfy .)
Moreover, if are subgroups of orders and , respectively, then exactly when divides .
In other words, the subgroups of look exactly like for the divisors of , and exactly when divides .
Finite fields
For each finite field , we recall the following basic facts:
The characteristic of is a positive prime integer .
There is a (unique, injective) field morphism , which allows us to consider as a field extension of the field . In particular, this allows us to consider as a -vector space. Since is finite (as a set), it must also be finite-dimensional as a -vector space.
If is the dimension of as a -vector space, then .
Every element satisfies , which in turn allows us to prove that is a splitting extension over for the polynomial . Since splitting extensions are unique (up to unique isomorphism), this proves that is the unique field of order (up to isomorphism).
If is a field morphism between finite fields, then and have the same characteristic (say ) and the dimension of as a -vector space divides the dimension of as a -vector space. In other words, we have and with .
Quick summary of the above facts: Every finite field has order for some prime and positive integer , and up to isomorphism there is exactly one field of each such order.
The big result we need from field theory
We need the following foundational result from field theory, which is sneakier to prove than it might seem:
Groups of units of fields
Suppose is any field and is its group of (multiplicative) units. Then every finite subgroup of is cyclic.
Corollary
Suppose is a finite field of order . Then .
So, if we're wondering about the subgroups of for a finite field, we just need to understand the subgroups of the cyclic group . Fortunately, the result above tells us the entire lattice structure for the subgroups of : there is a unique subgroup of order for each divisor of , and for two such subgroups we have exactly when divides .
The subgroup of powers of
Now we wish to understand the subgroup consisting of elements that are powers of elements in . This subgroup is exactly the image of the group morphism defined by . What is the size of this subgroup? One way to answer this question is to use the First Isomorphism Theorem for groups, which tells us that
In other words,
Can we compute This is the subgroup of consisting of those elements that satisfy , i.e., they are the elements of the field that are the roots of the polynomial . Or, strictly from the point of view of group theory, they are the elements in the group of order dividing .
From the description of such as the roots of , you might at first think there are exactly such elements. But remember that we're working in positive characteristic, so we can easily be duped by repeated roots. For example, if and , then we have , which only has one root!
We can make things easier on ourself by imposing some conditions on . For example, if we restrict ourselves to those that divide , then by our fact about finite cyclic groups above, the set of elements of order dividing is exactly the subgroup of of order . In other words, in this case and hence .
Now we can answer the following question:
A question about powers in finite fields
Suppose is a finite field of order and is a positive integer that divides . Let and let be the subgroup of powers in . When do we have ?
In this case, we have and (based on our work above) . Using our basic theory about subgroups of the finite cyclic group , we can answer the question: we have exactly when divides .
If desired, we can rewrite the divisibility condition equivalently as: exactly when divides .