Symmetric and alternating tensors

An action of the symmetric group on Tk(M)

For any R-module M there is a left action of the symmetric group Sk on the k-fold direct product M××M, given by permuting the factors:

σ(m1,,mk)=(mσ1(1),,mσ1(k)).

(The reason for σ1 is to make this a left group action.) This balanced, multilinear map corresponds to a left group action of Sk on Tk(M) which is defined on simple tensors by

σ(m1mk)=mσ1(1)mσ1(k).

For example,

(1,3,2)(m1m2m3)=m2m3m1.
Definition of symmetric and alternating tensors

Suppose R is a commutative ring and M is an R-module. An element zTk(M) is called:

  • a symmetric k-tensor if σz=z for all σSk
  • an alternating k-tensor if σz=sign(σ)z for all σSk.

For example, the elements mm and m1m2+m2m1 are symmetric 2-tensors, while the element m1m2m2m1 is an alternating 2-tensor. The 2-tensor m1m2 is neither symmetric nor alternating.

The collection of symmetric k-tensors forms a submodule of Tk(M), as does the collection of alternating k-tensors. These submodules are denoted ... nothing. At least as far as I can tell, Dummit & Foote doesn't use any notation for them.

One can prove that these submodules are stable under this action of Sk, hence there is an induced action on the quotient modules Sk(M) and k(M). Moreover, we have:

These actions seem identical to that of Sk on the submodules of Tk(M) consisting of the symmetric and alternating tensors, respectively. Let's investigate this a bit further.

Symmetrization and skew-symmetrization

For any k-tensor zTk(M), define

Sym(z)=σSkσzAlt(z)=σSksign(σ)σz.

It is straightforward to verify these k-tensors are symmetric and alternating, respectively. We call them the symmetrization and skew-symmetrization of z.

One can verify that we have actually defined R-module morphisms Sym:Tk(M)Tk(M) and Alt:Tk(M)Tk(M) whose images lie in the submodule of symmetric and alternating tensors, respectively.

Note that if z is a symmetric k-tensor, then

Sym(z)=k!z.

Similarly, if z is an alternating k-tensor, then

Alt(z)=k!z.

From these observations, it is not too difficult to prove the following:

Proposition

Suppose R is a commutative ring and M is an R-module. If k! is a unit in R, then there is an R-module isomorphism between Sk(M) (respectively, k(M)) and the submodule of Tk(M) consisting of all symmetric k-tensors (respectively, alternating k-tensors).

As an upshot, so long as k! is a unit in R, we can write Sym(Tk(M)) and Alt(Tk(M)) for the submodules of symmetric and alternating k-tensors, respectively.


Suggested next note

Noetherian modules