Ab-categories

"...a particularly perverse category theorist might define a ring as a preadditive category with exactly one object (in the same way that a monoid can be viewed as a category with only one object ...)"

Ab-categories


There are many familiar categories in which the hom-sets have additional structure:

Why have I cryptically written "... a (natural) structure ..." in each of the above examples? Intuitively, we would like composition to "respect" these added structures.

Rather than make this precise in full generality, let's focus on the examples of the categories Ab and R-Mod, in which the hom-sets have a (natural) structure of abelian groups.

Definition of an Ab-category

A Ab-category (also called an preadditive category) is a category A in which each hom-set HomA(a,b) has the structure of an abelian group, in such a way that composition is bilinear. In other words, for morphisms f,f:ab and g,g:bc we have

(g+g)(f+f)=gf+gf+gf+gf.

Note that because the composition of morphisms is bilinear, it can also be written using the tensor product (over Z) as a linear map:

HomA(b,c)ZHomA(a,b)HomA(a,c)

An alternative definition: enriched categories

Although the definition above is fairly straightforward, I'm not a huge fan of it. To me, it seems rather "extrinsic" to conventional category theory. What I mean by that is the definition requires structure beyond the usual reference to categories, functors and natural transformations. Is there a more "intrinsic" definition? Maybe, although that depends on what counts as "intrinsic."

One alternative is to define a preadditive category directly (without first defining a category), as given by the following data:

  1. A set of objects.

  2. A function that assigns to each ordered pair of objects (b,c) an abelian group A(b,c).

  3. For each ordered triple of objects (a,b,c) a morphism of abelian groups

    A(b,c)ZA(a,b)A(a,c).

    This morphism is called "composition" and written gfgf.

  4. For each object a a group morphism ZA(a,a). (This is the analogue of each object in a category having a unique identity arrow, which corresponds to a set map {}HomA(a,a).)

These data are required to satisfy the usual associative and unit laws for composition. This is a definition of Ab-category completely analogous to the definition of a conventional category, with:

Because of this definition, an Ab-category is sometimes called a category enriched over Ab. As the name suggests, this leads to a more general concept of enriched categories. For now, we'll leave that tantalizing idea for future exploration.

Additive functors


If we are dealing with Ab-categories, we will probably want to restrict our functors to those that respect addition of morphisms:

Definition of additive functors

If A and B are Ab-categories, a functor T:AB is said to be additive when every function T:HomA(a,a)HomB(T(a),T(a)) is a group morphism; i.e., when T(f+f)=T(f)+T(f) for all parallel morphisms f,f.

When talking about functors between Ab-categories, we will always assume we mean additive functors.

Suggested next note


Additive categories