Ab-categories
"...a particularly perverse category theorist might define a ring as a preadditive category with exactly one object (in the same way that a monoid can be viewed as a category with only one object ...)"
-categories
There are many familiar categories in which the hom-sets have additional structure:
- In the category
of vector spaces over a field , each hom-set has a (natural) structure of an -vector space. Addition is defined by addition of outputs; i.e., for every . The additive identity is the zero map. - In the category
of left -modules over a fixed ring , each hom-set has a (natural) structure of an abelian group. Once again, addition of morphisms is defined via addition of outputs. - When
is commutative, the hom-sets in have a (natural) structure of -modules. - In the category
of abelian groups, each hom-set has a (natural) structure of an abelian group, via addition of outputs.
Why have I cryptically written "... a (natural) structure ..." in each of the above examples? Intuitively, we would like composition to "respect" these added structures.
Rather than make this precise in full generality, let's focus on the examples of the categories
A
Note that because the composition of morphisms is bilinear, it can also be written using the tensor product (over
An alternative definition: enriched categories
Although the definition above is fairly straightforward, I'm not a huge fan of it. To me, it seems rather "extrinsic" to conventional category theory. What I mean by that is the definition requires structure beyond the usual reference to categories, functors and natural transformations. Is there a more "intrinsic" definition? Maybe, although that depends on what counts as "intrinsic."
One alternative is to define a preadditive category directly (without first defining a category), as given by the following data:
-
A set of objects.
-
A function that assigns to each ordered pair of objects
an abelian group . -
For each ordered triple of objects
a morphism of abelian groups This morphism is called "composition" and written
. -
For each object
a group morphism . (This is the analogue of each object in a category having a unique identity arrow, which corresponds to a set map .)
These data are required to satisfy the usual associative and unit laws for composition. This is a definition of
replaced by - Cartesian product
in replaced by tensor product in - the one-point set
replaced by
Because of this definition, an
Additive functors
If we are dealing with
If
When talking about functors between